Skip to content
Viewing as guestSign Up Free

METHODOLOGY · THE RULES ARE CODE
Source of truth: STRATEGY.md

How the machine manages the book.

The full strategy is a public, versioned document. This is the working digest: what the AI is allowed to do, what the code refuses to let it do, and where to check the receipts.



§1 · §3 · §6.2 — THE THESIS

Durable businesses, owned while the wind is at their back.

The Flagship owns 18–20 genuinely durable franchises — strong economics, sound balance sheets, managers who allocate capital well — and owns them while sovereign-wealth flows, hyperscaler capex, defense bills, and enacted policy are at their back. The tailwind is not the thesis; the durable business is. A position holds through drawdowns and weak prints as long as the business and its structural tailwind are intact, and exits when one of them breaks — not because the price moved.

The signal mix is fixed in policy: ~50% business durability (franchise, unit economics, balance sheet, management), ~30% policy & macro tailwind (defense bills, CHIPS/IRA-style programs, the rate backdrop), and ~20% capital-flow confirmation (13F deltas, capex commitments, insider clusters). Technicals and sentiment appear nowhere in that list — they decay too fast and add turnover without alpha.

Positions cluster in four pillars — a diversification frame, not a quota: Compute & AI infrastructure, Energy & grid, Defense & sovereign capability, Biology & longevity. Builder bias throughout: companies that physically build — fabs, reactors, ships, drug pipelines — are first-class.

Compute23.82%
Energy38.30%
Defense23.85%
Biology5.50%
Live pillar exposure from the current book · the 40% concentration cap binds per pillar.

§2 — THE GUARDRAILS

The model proposes. The caps dispose.

Every Monday the strategist proposes a target book — and a mechanical cap engine sizes it down to whatever the rules permit, no matter how convinced the model sounds. The caps are code (sizing/caps.js), not prompt instructions: changing one requires a strategy edit and a commit, never a persuasive argument.

Position count18–20Variable band — the strategist picks within it on conviction depth. New names displace old ones; the total stays inside the band.
Single-name cap12% · 18% ceiling12% at entry; only a mechanical conviction score ≥ 85 unlocks sizing up to the 18% hard cap. Breaches are force-trimmed.
Minimum position1% of NAVA sub-1% target snaps to a clean close — no dust slivers.
Theme concentration≤ 40% per pillarKeeps 'durable compounders' from quietly becoming a single-theme bet.
Country cap · non-US floor≤ 65% · ≥ 15%US is usually the binding country; the non-US floor is structural, satisfied via ADRs.
Tail-risk hedge floor≥ 2 slotsGold miners, oil majors, or diversified commodity producers — real positions with their own theses. A target cannot trade the book below the floor.
Leverage · derivativesNoneLong-only. No options, no inverse ETFs, no vol products — the paper book maps to a plain brokerage account.
Right now: 17 positions · 8.5% cash · 26.7% non-US — all inside the caps above.

§5.4 — CASH & REGIME

Three regimes set the cash band. Floors never move.

Cash is governed by a three-regime composite read weekly from VIX, the yield curve, credit spreads, market breadth, and index extension. The regime call proposes a cash target; the band is enforced mechanically at every decision seam.

RISK-ON0–10% cashHedges sized to the 2-slot floor; tilt toward Compute, away from Defense.
NEUTRAL5–15% cashHedges and pillars at strategic baseline.
RISK-OFF15–30% cashHedges sized up to 3–4 slots; tilt toward Defense, cash, and hedge equity.

When deterministic defensive signals fire, the ceiling of the current band extends — Extension (QQQ >+8% above its 200-day MA, or weekly RSI ≥ 70) adds +10pp, Stress (VIX >+25% vs its 200-day, or HY spreads +50bps in 20 days) adds +10pp, and Event risk (a binary macro event within 3 sessions) adds +5pp — hard-capped at 30% of NAV. The floor never moves: the escalator grants permission to defend, never a mandate to sell, and cash above the band with no active signal is rejected in post-validation regardless of the model's reasoning.

Current regime: NEUTRAL · cash target 14% · “Calm tape, extended QQQ — NEUTRAL defensive, cash near band top, energy bid on Hormuz

§6.3 — CONVICTION

A score is the output of a written thesis, not the input to a sort.

Every candidate gets a 0–100 conviction score derived from four questions the agent must answer in writing: why this is a durable 20–30 year compounder; what named policy or macro tailwind is at its back; who is confirming it with capital; and what, specifically, would break the thesis. Names below 60 are not investable. Names at 60 and above are sized in proportion to (score − 60), subject to every cap in the ledger above.

Generic theses are refused mechanically at the buy seam: “strong fundamentals,” “compelling AI exposure,” a bare score, or a doc-pointer gets the open dropped and a refusal row appended to the public journal. If the agent cannot articulate the durable business and name its tailwind, the position cannot enter the book.


§6.5d — THE LOCK

A 30-day lock protects the book from its own manager.

New positions carry a 30-day floor on trims and closes. Inside that first month, only a true regime change, a real break in the company's thesis, or a policy shock that postdates the entry can shrink the position — not flow softening, not score drift, not a shinier candidate on the watchlist. The lock is mechanical: it sits at every sell-emission seam, and an override requires citing one of the named paths, which is then journaled.

Refusals are public. When the lock (or the named-flow gate above) blocks an action the model wanted, the refusal lands in the journal with the same prominence as a trade — “checked, nothing to enforce” is itself evidence the rules run every week.


§10.8 — THE CADENCE

One decision a week. Observation every day.

A 1+ month hold horizon doesn't want three full model runs a week — that's over-trading by design. The cadence is tiered, and only the deep runs are allowed to trade:

Weekly deep — OpusMon 10:00 ETThe only scheduled ticket-emitting run: scoring refresh → regime call → per-position briefings → strategist call → mechanical caps → tickets. Fills land 11:00 the same session, at prices the model could actually have transacted at.
Midweek check — SonnetWed 18:00 ETObservation only. Re-briefs every position against the week's regime state; flags broken theses for the next deep. No tickets.
Intraday scans — HaikuM–F, half-hourlyCheap triage across the held book — news and sentiment flags, escalation when enough of them stack up. Never trades.
Monthly audit — OpusFirst trading dayThe weekly deep with a widened token budget, run in place of that week's deep.
Autopilot sentinelsEvent-drivenPrice and policy shocks trip a Sonnet gate; only if it passes does a scoped Opus patch run — and the §2 caps still bind.

§5.1 — THE BENCHMARK

The S&P 500 is not the benchmark.

The book is measured against a custom civilizational-builder basket: 25% per pillar, equal weight within each pillar, rebalanced on the first trading day of each calendar quarter, computed on the same price-return basis as the paper book. The constituent list is versioned and append-only. Beating SPY with a defense-and-uranium book in a tech rally proves little; beating the builders it actually competes with proves the selection.

The full track record, benchmark series, and CSV/JSON exports

§13.6 — THE RECEIPTS

Don't trust the summary. Check the ledger.

Every regime call, strategist run, scoring delta, refusal, and trade ticket is appended to a public journal whose entries are hash-chained — editing any historical entry breaks its fingerprint and every link after it, and the chain is re-verified on a public endpoint. The reasoning is timestamped before the market opens on it; the costs of producing it are published down to the model call.

Ledger verified — chain intact40 runs · $14.18 model spend, trailing 30d

The Flagship is a paper portfolio — no real capital is at risk and results are hypothetical. Capital Compass AI publishes research and reasoning, not financial advice. Past performance, real or simulated, does not guarantee future results.